From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@suse.de, dhillf@gmail.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, mhocko@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V4 09/10] memcg: move HugeTLB resource count to parent cgroup on memcg removal
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:04:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F66A258.5060301@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331919570-2264-10-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
(2012/03/17 2:39), Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This add support for memcg removal with HugeTLB resource usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
seems ok for now.
Now, Tejun and Costa, and I are discussing removeing -EBUSY from rmdir().
We're now considering 'if use_hierarchy=false and parent seems full,
reclaim all or move charges to the root cgroup.' then -EBUSY will go away.
Is it accesptable for hugetlb ? Do you have another idea ?
Thanks,
-Kame
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 ++++
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 15 +++++++++-
> mm/hugetlb.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 6919100..32e948c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -349,11 +349,17 @@ static inline unsigned int pages_per_huge_page(struct hstate *h)
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTLR_HUGETLB
> extern int register_hugetlb_memcg_files(struct cgroup *cgroup,
> struct cgroup_subsys *ss);
> +extern int hugetlb_force_memcg_empty(struct cgroup *cgroup);
> #else
> static inline int register_hugetlb_memcg_files(struct cgroup *cgroup,
> struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static inline int hugetlb_force_memcg_empty(struct cgroup *cgroup)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif
> #endif /* _LINUX_HUGETLB_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 73900b9..0980122 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -441,7 +441,9 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_hugetlb_uncharge_page(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
> extern void mem_cgroup_hugetlb_uncharge_memcg(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> extern int mem_cgroup_hugetlb_file_init(int idx);
> -
> +extern int mem_cgroup_move_hugetlb_parent(int idx, struct cgroup *cgroup,
> + struct page *page);
> +extern bool mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(struct cgroup *cgroup);
> #else
> static inline int
> mem_cgroup_hugetlb_charge_page(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
> @@ -477,6 +479,17 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_hugetlb_file_init(int idx)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int
> +mem_cgroup_move_hugetlb_parent(int idx, struct cgroup *cgroup,
> + struct page *page)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(struct cgroup *cgroup)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTLR_HUGETLB */
> #endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 8fd465d..685f0d5 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1842,6 +1842,47 @@ int register_hugetlb_memcg_files(struct cgroup *cgroup,
> }
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Force the memcg to empty the hugetlb resources by moving them to
> + * the parent cgroup. We can fail if the parent cgroup's limit prevented
> + * the charging. This should only happen if use_hierarchy is not set.
> + */
> +int hugetlb_force_memcg_empty(struct cgroup *cgroup)
> +{
> + struct hstate *h;
> + struct page *page;
> + int ret = 0, idx = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + if (cgroup_task_count(cgroup) || !list_empty(&cgroup->children))
> + goto out;
> + /*
> + * If the task doing the cgroup_rmdir got a signal
> + * we don't really need to loop till the hugetlb resource
> + * usage become zero.
> + */
> + if (signal_pending(current)) {
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + for_each_hstate(h) {
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(page, &h->hugepage_activelist, lru) {
> + ret = mem_cgroup_move_hugetlb_parent(idx, cgroup, page);
> + if (ret) {
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + idx++;
> + }
> + cond_resched();
> + } while (mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(cgroup));
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> #endif
>
> /* Should be called on processing a hugepagesz=... option */
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4900b72..e29d86d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3171,9 +3171,11 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_move_swap_account(swp_entry_t entry,
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTLR_HUGETLB
> -static bool mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +bool mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(struct cgroup *cgroup)
> {
> int idx;
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
> +
> for (idx = 0; idx < hugetlb_max_hstate; idx++) {
> if (memcg->hugepage[idx].usage > 0)
> return 1;
> @@ -3285,10 +3287,57 @@ void mem_cgroup_hugetlb_uncharge_memcg(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
> res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->hugepage[idx], csize);
> return;
> }
> -#else
> -static bool mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +
> +int mem_cgroup_move_hugetlb_parent(int idx, struct cgroup *cgroup,
> + struct page *page)
> {
> - return 0;
> + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + int csize, ret = 0;
> + struct res_counter *fail_res;
> + struct cgroup *pcgrp = cgroup->parent;
> + struct mem_cgroup *parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(pcgrp);
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
> +
> + if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
> + goto out;
> +
> + pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> + lock_page_cgroup(pc);
> + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc) || pc->mem_cgroup != memcg)
> + goto err_out;
> +
> + csize = PAGE_SIZE << compound_order(page);
> + /*
> + * uncharge from child and charge the parent. If we have
> + * use_hierarchy set, we can never fail here. In-order to make
> + * sure we don't get -ENOMEM on parent charge, we first uncharge
> + * the child and then charge the parent.
> + */
> + if (parent->use_hierarchy) {
> + res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->hugepage[idx], csize);
> + if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(parent))
> + ret = res_counter_charge(&parent->hugepage[idx],
> + csize, &fail_res);
> + } else {
> + if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(parent)) {
> + ret = res_counter_charge(&parent->hugepage[idx],
> + csize, &fail_res);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> + }
> + res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->hugepage[idx], csize);
> + }
> + /*
> + * caller should have done css_get
> + */
> + pc->mem_cgroup = parent;
> +err_out:
> + unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
> + put_page(page);
> +out:
> + return ret;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTLR_HUGETLB */
>
> @@ -3806,6 +3855,11 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool free_all)
> /* should free all ? */
> if (free_all)
> goto try_to_free;
> +
> + /* move the hugetlb charges */
> + ret = hugetlb_force_memcg_empty(cgrp);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> move_account:
> do {
> ret = -EBUSY;
> @@ -5103,12 +5157,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_pre_destroy(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> struct cgroup *cont)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> - /*
> - * Don't allow memcg removal if we have HugeTLB resource
> - * usage.
> - */
> - if (mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(memcg))
> - return -EBUSY;
>
> return mem_cgroup_force_empty(memcg, false);
> }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-16 17:39 [PATCH -V4 00/10] memcg: Add memcg extension to control HugeTLB allocation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 01/10] hugetlb: rename max_hstate to hugetlb_max_hstate Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 2:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-28 9:18 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 02/10] hugetlbfs: don't use ERR_PTR with VM_FAULT* values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 2:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-19 6:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-28 9:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-28 11:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 03/10] hugetlbfs: Add an inline helper for finding hstate index Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 2:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-28 9:41 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 04/10] memcg: Add HugeTLB extension Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 2:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-19 6:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 7:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-19 11:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-19 12:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-21 4:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-21 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-28 11:33 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-28 13:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-28 15:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-28 13:40 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-28 17:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-29 0:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29 7:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 05/10] hugetlb: add charge/uncharge calls for HugeTLB alloc/free Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-19 7:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-28 13:17 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-28 17:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-29 8:10 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-30 10:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-30 10:46 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 06/10] memcg: track resource index in cftype private Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 2:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 07/10] hugetlbfs: Add memcg control files for hugetlbfs Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 2:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-19 7:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 7:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-20 9:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 08/10] hugetlbfs: Add a list for tracking in-use HugeTLB pages Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 3:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-19 8:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-28 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-28 17:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-29 8:11 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 09/10] memcg: move HugeTLB resource count to parent cgroup on memcg removal Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-19 3:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-03-19 9:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-28 14:07 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH -V4 10/10] memcg: Add memory controller documentation for hugetlb management Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-28 14:36 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F66A258.5060301@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox