From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
gthelen@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kirill@shutemov.name, avagin@parallels.com, devel@openvz.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:48:26 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE9983A.3060101@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111215.004836.402973956281143052.davem@davemloft.net>
On 12/15/2011 09:48 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:40:19 +0900
>
>> I met this bug at _1st_ run. Please enable _all_ debug options!.
>
> Plus the CONFIG_NET=n and other build failures.
>
> This patch series was seriously rushed, and very poorly handled.
>
> Yet I kept getting so much pressure to review, comment upon, and
> ultimately apply these patches. Never, ever, do this to me ever
> again.
>
> If I don't feel your patches are high priority enough or ready enough
> for me to review, then TOO BAD. Don't ask people to pressure me or
> get my attention. Instead, ask others for help and do testing before
> wasting MY time and crapping up MY tree.
>
> I should have noticed a red flag when I have James Bottomly asking me
> to look at these patches, I should have pushed back. Instead, I
> relented, and now I'm very seriously regretting it.
>
> All the regressions in the net-next tree over the past several days
> have been due to this patch set, and this patch set alone.
>
> This code wasn't ready and needed, at a minimum, several more weeks of
> work before being put in.
>
> Instead, we're going to bandaid patch it up after the fact, rather
> than just letting these changes mature naturally during the review
> process.
Hi Dave,
You are right about all points. I will admit to it, face it, and
apologize it.
I guess the best I can do right now is fix whatever you guys point me to
and not repeat it in the future.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-15 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-12 7:47 Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-12-14 17:04 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-15 12:29 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-16 12:32 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-16 13:02 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-16 13:30 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-16 6:20 ` Greg Thelen
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-12-22 21:10 ` Jason Baron
2011-12-23 8:57 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] tcp memory pressure controls Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] Display current tcp failcnt " Glauber Costa
2011-12-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] Display maximum tcp memory allocation " Glauber Costa
2011-12-13 0:07 ` [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls David Miller
2011-12-13 13:49 ` Christoph Paasch
2011-12-13 13:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-13 18:45 ` David Miller
2011-12-13 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-15 5:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-15 5:48 ` David Miller
2011-12-15 6:48 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE9983A.3060101@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=avagin@parallels.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox