From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E722D6B0069 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:33:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4EB878F3.1040508@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:33:55 -0500 From: KOSAKI Motohiro MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tmpfs: support user quotas References: <1320614101.3226.5.camel@offbook> <20111107112952.GB25130@tango.0pointer.de> <1320675607.2330.0.camel@offworld> <20111107135823.3a7cdc53@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20111107143010.GA3630@tango.0pointer.de> <4EB8586B.5060804@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: kay.sievers@vrfy.org Cc: mzxreary@0pointer.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, dave@gnu.org, hch@infradead.org, hughd@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org (11/7/2011 5:37 PM), Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 23:15, KOSAKI Motohiro > wrote: >> (11/7/2011 6:30 AM), Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> If you want per-user limitation, RLIMIT is bad idea. RLIMIT is only inherited >> by fork. So, The api semantics clearly mismatch your usecase. > > Like RLIMIT_NPROC? I suggest to don't follow useless interfaces. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org