From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.247]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35677900138 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:02:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E6A001C.2040600@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:01:32 -0300 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] per-cgroup tcp buffers control References: <1315369399-3073-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1315369399-3073-7-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20110909121206.e1d628d1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20110909121206.e1d628d1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xemul@parallels.com, "David S. Miller" , "Eric W. Biederman" On 09/09/2011 12:12 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:23:16 -0300 > Glauber Costa wrote: > >> With all the infrastructure in place, this patch implements >> per-cgroup control for tcp memory pressure handling. >> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa >> CC: David S. Miller >> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa >> CC: Eric W. Biederman > > Hmm, then, kmem_cgroup.c is just a caller of plugins implemented > by other components ? Kame, Refer to my discussion with Greg. How would you feel about it being accounted to a single "kernel memory" limit in memcg? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org