From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, mm: start mmap allocation for libs from low addresses
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:24:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5290D6.5050406@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110822101730.GA3346@albatros>
On 08/22/2011 03:17 AM, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas,
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 13:05 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
>> As the changes are not intrusive, we'd want to see this feature in the
>> upstream kernel. If you know why the patch cannot be a part of the
>> upstream kernel - please tell me, I'll try to address the issues.
>
> Any comments on the RFC? Otherwise, may I resend it as a PATCH for
> inclusion?
>
> Thanks!
Conceptually:
I also have to admit to being somewhat skeptical to the concept on a
littleendian architecture like x86.
Code-wise:
The code is horrific; it is full of open-coded magic numbers; it also
puts a function called arch_get_unmapped_exec_area() in a generic file,
which could best be described as "WTF" -- the arch_ prefix we use
specifically to denote a per-architecture hook function.
As such, your claim that the changes are not intrusive is plain false.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-12 10:29 Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 23:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-13 6:26 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-16 9:05 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 10:17 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 17:24 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-08-22 20:14 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-23 6:41 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5290D6.5050406@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox