Re: running of out memory => kernel crash

[Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>]

On 08/19/2011 01:29 PM, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:26, Pavel Ivanov<paivanof@gmail.com>  wrote:

>> Could you elaborate on this? We have a completely unusable server
>> which can be revived only by hard power cycling (administrators won't
>> be able to log in because sshd and shell will fall victims of the same
>> unending disk reading). And as an alternative we can kill some process
>> and at least allow administrator to log in and check if something else
>> can be done to make server feel better. Why is it worse?
>>
>> I understand that it could be very hard to detect such situation but
>> at least it's worth trying I think.
>
> Deciding when to call the server unusable is a policy decision that
> the kernel can't make very easily on its own; the point when the
> system is considered unusable may be different depending on workload.
> You could create a userspace daemon, however, that mlockall()s, then
> monitors memory usage, load average, etc and kills processes when
> things start to go south. You could also use the memory resource
> cgroup controller to set hard limits on memory usage.

Indeed.  From the point of view of the OS, it's running everything on 
the system without a problem.  It's deep into swap, but it's running.

If there are application requirements on grade-of-service, it's up to 
the application to check whether those are being met and if not to do 
something about it.

Chris

-- 
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.friesen@genband.com
www.genband.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>