From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, mingo@elte.hu, rick@vanrein.org,
rdunlap@xenotime.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:33:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0251AB.8090702@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0250F2.2010607@kpanic.de>
On 06/22/2011 01:30 PM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 22.06.2011 20:15, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/22/2011 04:18 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>>>
>>> The idea is to allow the user to specify RAM addresses that shouldn't be
>>> touched by the OS, because they are broken in some way. Not all machines have
>>> hardware support for hwpoison, ECC RAM, etc, so here's a solution that allows to
>>> use bitmasks to mask address patterns with the new "badram" kernel command line
>>> parameter.
>>> Memtest86 has an option to generate these patterns since v2.3 so the only thing
>>> for the user to do should be:
>>> - run Memtest86
>>> - note down the pattern
>>> - add badram=<pattern> to the kernel command line
>>>
>>
>> We already support the equivalent functionality with
>> memmap=<address>$<length> for those with only a few ranges... this has
>> been supported for ages, literally. For those with a lot of ranges,
>> like Google, the command line is insufficient.
>
> Right, I think this has been discussed a while ago. So the advantages I
> see in this approach are. It allows to break down memory exclusion to
> the page level with a pattern of non-consecutive pages. So if every
> other page would be considered bad that's a bit tough to deal with using
> memmap.
> Secondly patterns can be easily generated by running Memtest86 and thus
> easily be fed to the kernel by command line. Making it much more feasible
> for the average user to take advantage of it.
>
How common are nontrivial patterns on real hardware? This would be
interesting to hear from Google or another large user.
If so, we should probably introduce this as another linked-list data
structure; we can allow it to be preprocessed from the command line if
need be.
I have to say I think Google's point that truncating the list is
unacceptable... that would mean running in a known-bad configuration,
and even a hard crash would be better.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 11:18 Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Add string parsing function get_next_ulong Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Add documentation and credits for BadRAM Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 18:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 18:06 ` Josh Boyer
2011-06-22 18:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-06-22 18:11 ` Nancy Yuen
2011-06-22 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 19:01 ` Nancy Yuen
2011-06-22 19:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 18:24 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 18:38 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 18:56 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 19:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 19:15 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 20:28 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 19:46 ` [PATCH] x86: e820: Eliminate bubble sort from sanitize_e820_map Mike Ditto
2011-06-22 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) Stefan Assmann
2011-06-23 10:33 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-23 10:49 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-23 10:10 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-22 18:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 20:30 ` Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 20:33 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-06-23 13:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-23 14:08 ` Stefan Assmann
2011-06-23 14:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-23 15:37 ` Stefan Assmann
2011-06-23 16:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-24 0:59 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-23 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-23 17:12 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-24 1:03 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-24 1:08 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-24 1:22 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-24 8:05 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-24 14:34 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-24 16:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-24 16:40 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-24 16:56 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-24 17:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] <fa.fHPNPTsllvyE/7DxrKwiwgVbVww@ifi.uio.no>
2011-06-24 21:10 ` Shane Nay
2011-06-28 2:33 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-29 8:08 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-29 15:28 ` craig lkml
2011-06-29 16:06 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-29 21:24 ` Tony Luck
2011-06-30 14:32 ` Jody Belka
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-21 9:23 Stefan Assmann
2011-06-21 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 11:11 ` Stefan Assmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0251AB.8090702@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rick@vanrein.org \
--cc=sassmann@kpanic.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox