linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, caiqian@redhat.com,
	rientjes@google.com, hughd@google.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
	oleg@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] oom: kill younger process first
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:02:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD62007.6020600@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD61F80.1020505@jp.fujitsu.com>

This patch introduces do_each_thread_reverse() and select_bad_process()
uses it. The benefits are two, 1) oom-killer can kill younger process
than older if they have a same oom score. Usually younger process is
less important. 2) younger task often have PF_EXITING because shell
script makes a lot of short lived processes. Reverse order search can
detect it faster.

Reported-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |   11 +++++++++++
 mm/oom_kill.c         |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 013314a..3698379 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2194,6 +2194,9 @@ static inline unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p,
 #define next_task(p) \
 	list_entry_rcu((p)->tasks.next, struct task_struct, tasks)

+#define prev_task(p) \
+	list_entry((p)->tasks.prev, struct task_struct, tasks)
+
 #define for_each_process(p) \
 	for (p = &init_task ; (p = next_task(p)) != &init_task ; )

@@ -2206,6 +2209,14 @@ extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
 #define do_each_thread(g, t) \
 	for (g = t = &init_task ; (g = t = next_task(g)) != &init_task ; ) do

+/*
+ * Similar to do_each_thread(). but two difference are there.
+ *  - traverse tasks reverse order (i.e. younger to older)
+ *  - caller must hold tasklist_lock. rcu_read_lock isn't enough
+*/
+#define do_each_thread_reverse(g, t) \
+	for (g = t = &init_task ; (g = t = prev_task(g)) != &init_task ; ) do
+
 #define while_each_thread(g, t) \
 	while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 43d32ae..e6a6c6f 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned int *ppoints,
 	struct task_struct *chosen = NULL;
 	*ppoints = 0;

-	do_each_thread(g, p) {
+	do_each_thread_reverse(g, p) {
 		unsigned int points;

 		if (!p->mm)
-- 
1.7.3.1



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-20  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  8:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix oom killer doesn't work at all if system have > gigabytes memory (aka CAI founded issue) KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-20  8:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] oom: improve dump_tasks() show items KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23 22:16   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-20  8:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-05-23  2:37   ` [PATCH 2/5] oom: kill younger process first Minchan Kim
2011-05-23 22:20   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-20  8:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] oom: oom-killer don't use proportion of system-ram internally KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23  3:59   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  1:14     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  1:32       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-23  4:02   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  1:44     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  3:11       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23 22:28   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-23 22:48     ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  1:21       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  8:32       ` CAI Qian
2011-05-26  7:08       ` CAI Qian
2011-05-27 19:12         ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  2:07     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-26  9:34   ` CAI Qian
2011-05-26  9:56     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-20  8:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] oom: don't kill random process KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23  4:31   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  1:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  8:46       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  8:49         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  9:04           ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  9:09             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  9:20               ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  9:38                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23 22:32   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  1:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  1:39       ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  1:55         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  1:58           ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  2:03             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-25 23:50               ` David Rientjes
2011-05-30  1:17                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:48                   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-31  4:54                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-20  8:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] oom: merge oom_kill_process() with oom_kill_task() KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  1:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix oom killer doesn't work at all if system have > gigabytes memory (aka CAI founded issue) CAI Qian
2011-05-31  4:10   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:14     ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  4:34       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:49       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:32     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:52     ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  7:04       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  7:50         ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  7:56           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  7:59             ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  8:11               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31 10:01                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-01  1:17                   ` CAI Qian
2011-06-01  3:32                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06  3:07                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-06 14:44                       ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD62007.6020600@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox