linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpuset,mm: use rwlock to protect task->mempolicy and 	mems_allowed
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:33:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B931068.70900@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad831003050403v2e988723k1b6bf38d48707ab1@mail.gmail.com>

on 2010-3-5 20:03, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> if MAX_NUMNODES > BITS_PER_LONG, loading/storing task->mems_allowed or mems_allowed in
>> task->mempolicy are not atomic operations, and the kernel page allocator gets an empty
>> mems_allowed when updating task->mems_allowed or mems_allowed in task->mempolicy. So we
>> use a rwlock to protect them to fix this probelm.
> 
> Rather than adding locks, if the intention is just to avoid the
> allocator seeing an empty nodemask couldn't we instead do the
> equivalent of:
> 
> current->mems_allowed |= new_mask;
> current->mems_allowed = new_mask;
> 
> i.e. effectively set all new bits in the nodemask first, and then
> clear all old bits that are no longer in the new mask. The only
> downside of this is that a page allocation that races with the update
> could potentially allocate from any node in the union of the old and
> new nodemasks - but that's the case anyway for an allocation that
> races with an update, so I don't see that it's any worse.

Before applying this patch, cpuset updates task->mems_allowed just like
what you said. But the allocator is still likely to see an empty nodemask.
This problem have been pointed out by Nick Piggin.

The problem is following:
The size of nodemask_t is greater than the size of long integer, so loading
and storing of nodemask_t are not atomic operations. If task->mems_allowed
don't intersect with new_mask, such as the first word of the mask is empty
and only the first word of new_mask is not empty. When the allocator
loads a word of the mask before

	current->mems_allowed |= new_mask;

and then loads another word of the mask after

	current->mems_allowed = new_mask;

the allocator gets an empty nodemask.

I make a new patch to fix this problem now.
Considering the change of task->mems_allowed is not frequent, so in the new
patch, I use variables as a tag to indicate whether task->mems_allowed need
be update or not. And before setting the tag, cpuset caches the new mask of
every task at somewhere. 

When the allocator want to access task->mems_allowed, it must check updated-tag
first. If the tag is set, the allocator enters the slow path and updates
task->mems_allowed.

Thanks!
Miao

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-07  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03 10:52 Miao Xie
2010-03-03 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-04  9:03   ` Miao Xie
2010-03-04  3:30 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-04  9:36   ` Miao Xie
2010-03-04 14:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 16:34     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-04  4:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-04 14:31 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-03-05 13:05   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-03-05 12:03 ` Paul Menage
2010-03-07  2:33   ` Miao Xie [this message]
2010-03-09 19:42     ` Paul Menage
2010-03-11  5:04       ` Miao Xie
2010-03-11  5:30         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11  7:57           ` Miao Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B931068.70900@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox