From: Piet Delaney <pdelaney@tensilica.com>
To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Piet Delaney <Piet.Delaney@tensilica.com>
Cc: piet delaney <piet.delaney@gmail.com>
Subject: Conceptual difference between VM_CAN_NONLINEAR and VM_NONLINEAR ; path by which VM_NONLINEAR is suppose to be set.
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 02:37:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B90DF01.7070107@tensilica.com> (raw)
I'm getting a PANIC while working with mmap'd files due to the
VM_NONLINEAR not being set when working with the pte's. I looked quite
a few places and haven't found a clear explanation of how VM_NONLINEAR
differs conceptually from VM_CAN_NONLINEAR. It looks like VM_CAN_NONLINEAR
is suppose to be set earlier and VM_NONLINEAR later when something in
particular is done. I see it set via the remap_file_pages() system call
but not by mmap() via shmem_mmap().
Our open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/6-2.test panic is
avoided with by setting VM_NONLINEAR when the file is mapped but I really
doubt this is appropriate as the test runs fine on i386.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
static int shmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
file_accessed(file);
vma->vm_ops = &shmem_vm_ops;
#if 1
/* Wrong but didn't panic */
vma->vm_flags |= (VM_CAN_NONLINEAR|VM_NONLINEAR);
#else
/* Right but panics here via LTP posix mmap/6-2.test */
vma->vm_flags |= VM_CAN_NONLINEAR;
#endif
return 0;
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was hopping this hack would panic the system and that would help explain
why this approach is wrong, but unfortunately it worked.
Could someone take a minute and explain the conceptual difference of
these two vma flags and the path by which the VM_NONLINEAR flag is
suppose to be set.
-piet
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
reply other threads:[~2010-03-05 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B90DF01.7070107@tensilica.com \
--to=pdelaney@tensilica.com \
--cc=Piet.Delaney@tensilica.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=piet.delaney@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox