linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: lwoodman@redhat.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, aarcange@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: limit concurrent reclaimers in shrink_zone
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:24:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B22B89A.3060009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360912101803i7b43db78se8cf9ec61d92ee0f@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/10/2009 09:03 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>  wrote:
>> Under very heavy multi-process workloads, like AIM7, the VM can
>> get into trouble in a variety of ways.  The trouble start when
>> there are hundreds, or even thousands of processes active in the
>> page reclaim code.

> Otherwise looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@gmail.com>

OK, we found three issues with my patch :)

1) there is a typo in sysctl.c

2) there is another typo in Documentation/vm/sysctl.c

3) the code in vmscan.c has a bug, where tasks without
     __GFP_IO or __GFP_FS can end up waiting for tasks
     with __GFP_IO or __GFP_FS, leading to a deadlock

I will fix these issues and send out a new patch.

-- 
All rights reversed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-11 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-10 23:56 Rik van Riel
2009-12-11  2:03 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-11  3:19   ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-11  3:43     ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-11 12:07   ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-11 13:41     ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-11 13:51       ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-11 14:08         ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-11 13:48     ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-11 21:24   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2009-12-11 11:49 ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-14 13:08 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-14 14:23   ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-14 16:19     ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-14 14:40   ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 13:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-14 14:22   ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-14 14:52   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B22B89A.3060009@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox