From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 043166B003D for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:59:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B20EF88.7050402@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:54:32 -0500 From: Larry Woodman Reply-To: lwoodman@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/8] Replace page_referenced() with wipe_page_reference() References: <20091210154822.2550.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091210163123.255C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20091210163123.255C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli List-ID: KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > @@ -578,7 +577,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, > > + struct page_reference_context refctx = { > + .is_page_locked = 1, > > * > @@ -1289,7 +1291,6 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone, > > + struct page_reference_context refctx = { > + .is_page_locked = 0, > + }; > + > are these whole structs properly initialized on the kernel stack? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org