From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29D060021B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:56:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B1E1513.3020000@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:57:55 +0900 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: don't use vmalloc_end References: <4B1D3A3302000078000241CD@vpn.id2.novell.com> <20091207153552.0fadf335.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4B1E1B1B0200007800024345@vpn.id2.novell.com> <4B1E0E56.8020003@kernel.org> <4B1E1EE60200007800024364@vpn.id2.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1E1EE60200007800024364@vpn.id2.novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On 12/08/2009 05:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> Tejun Heo 08.12.09 09:29 >>> >> Hmm... it shouldn't be building. > > How can it not be building? It's in vmalloc.c (which must be built) and not > inside any conditional. Ah... yes, right. Somehow I was thinking it lived in percpu.c. Sorry about that. Probably the right thing to do is to wrap the function inside CONFIG ifdef's. I'll prep a patch. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org