From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8C960021B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:28:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B1E0E56.8020003@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:29:10 +0900 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: don't use vmalloc_end References: <4B1D3A3302000078000241CD@vpn.id2.novell.com> <20091207153552.0fadf335.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4B1E1B1B0200007800024345@vpn.id2.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1E1B1B0200007800024345@vpn.id2.novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Morton , tony.luck@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On 12/08/2009 05:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > According to Tejun the problem is just cosmetic (i.e. causes build > warnings), since the functions affected aren't being used (yet) on > ia64. So feel free to drop the patch again, given that he has a patch > queued to address the issue by renaming the arch variable. > > I wonder though why that code is being built on ia64 at all if it's not > being used (i.e. why it doesn't depend on a CONFIG_*, HAVE_*, or > NEED_* manifest constant). Hmm... it shouldn't be building. Can you please attach .config? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org