From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: don't use vmalloc_end
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:33:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1D9EF2.4010406@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091207153552.0fadf335.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 12/08/2009 08:35 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc linux-ia64)
>
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:24:03 +0000
> "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
>> At least on ia64 vmalloc_end is a global variable that VMALLOC_END
>> expands to. Hence having a local variable named vmalloc_end and
>> initialized from VMALLOC_END won't work on such platforms. Rename
>> these variables, and for consistency also rename vmalloc_start.
>>
>
> erk. So does 2.6.32's vmalloc() actually work correctly on ia64?
>
> Perhaps vmalloc_end wasn't a well chosen name for an arch-specific
> global variable.
>
> arch/m68k/include/asm/pgtable_mm.h does the same thing. Did it break too?
Hmmm... ISTR writing a patch updating ia64 so that it doesn't use that
macro. Looking it up.... Yeap, 126b3fcdecd350cad9700908d0ad845084e26a31
in percpu#for-next.
ia64: don't alias VMALLOC_END to vmalloc_end
If CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP is enabled, ia64 defines macro VMALLOC_END
as unsigned long variable vmalloc_end which is adjusted to prepare
room for vmemmap. This becomes probnlematic if a local variables
vmalloc_end is defined in some function (not very unlikely) and
VMALLOC_END is used in the function - the function thinks its
referencing the global VMALLOC_END value but would be referencing its
own local vmalloc_end variable.
There's no reason VMALLOC_END should be a macro. Just define it as an
unsigned long variable if CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP is set to avoid nasty
surprises.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
2.6.32 doesn't use new allocator on ia64 yet and the above commit will
be sent to Linus soon which will also enable new allocator.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 16:24 Jan Beulich
2009-12-07 23:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-08 0:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-12-08 0:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-08 6:57 ` [PATCH] m68k: don't alias VMALLOC_END to vmalloc_end Tejun Heo
2009-12-08 9:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-12-08 0:50 ` [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: don't use vmalloc_end Matthew Wilcox
2009-12-08 1:03 ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-08 8:23 ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-08 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-08 8:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-08 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-09 23:43 ` [PATCH -stable] vmalloc: conditionalize build of pcpu_get_vm_areas() Tejun Heo
2009-12-16 23:12 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-12-17 0:01 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 0:02 ` Greg KH
2009-12-09 17:31 ` [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: don't use vmalloc_end Christoph Lameter
2009-12-09 17:48 ` Luck, Tony
2009-12-09 18:10 ` Mike Travis
2009-12-09 18:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-09 18:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-09 18:37 ` Mike Travis
2009-12-09 18:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-08 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-12-08 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-09 8:47 ` [PATCH] m68k: rename global variable vmalloc_end to m68k_vmalloc_end Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B1D9EF2.4010406@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox