From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A29EE6B0093 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:10:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so224295bwz.6 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:10:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B0DC764.8040205@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:10:12 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmVkcmFuIEZ1cmHEjQ==?= Reply-To: vedran.furac@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_kill: use rss value instead of vm size for badness References: <20091028175846.49a1d29c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091029100042.973328d3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091125124433.GB27615@random.random> In-Reply-To: <20091125124433.GB27615@random.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: David Rientjes , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , KOSAKI Motohiro List-ID: Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Hello, Hi all! > lengthy discussion on something I think is quite obviously better and > I tried to change a couple of years back already (rss instead of > total_vm). Now that 2.6.32 is almost out, is it possible to get OOMK fixed in 2.6.33 so that I could turn overcommit on (overcommit_memory=0) again without fear of loosing my work? Regards, Vedran -- http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org