linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:45:35 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC0234F.2080808@crca.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090925174009.79778649.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Hi.

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:34:56 +1000
> Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>>> I have some code in TuxOnIce that needs a bit too (explicitly mark the
>>>> VMA as needing to be atomically copied, for GEM objects), and am not
>>>> sure what the canonical way to proceed is. Should a new unsigned long be
>>>> added? The difficulty I see with that is that my flag was used in
>>>> shmem_file_setup's flags parameter (drm_gem_object_alloc), so that
>>>> function would need an extra parameter too..
>>> Hmm, how about adding vma->vm_flags2 ?
>> The difficulty there is that some functions pass these flags as arguments.
>>
> Ah yes. But I wonder some special flags, which is rarey used, can be moved
> to vm_flags2...
> 
> For example,
> 
>  #define VM_SEQ_READ     0x00008000      /* App will access data sequentially */
>  #define VM_RAND_READ    0x00010000      /* App will not benefit from clustered reads */
> are all capsuled under
> mm.h
>  117 #define VM_READHINTMASK                 (VM_SEQ_READ | VM_RAND_READ)
>  118 #define VM_ClearReadHint(v)             (v)->vm_flags &= ~VM_READHINTMASK
>  119 #define VM_NormalReadHint(v)            (!((v)->vm_flags & VM_READHINTMASK))
>  120 #define VM_SequentialReadHint(v)        ((v)->vm_flags & VM_SEQ_READ)
>  121 #define VM_RandomReadHint(v)            ((v)->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ)
> 
> Or
> 
> 105 #define VM_PFN_AT_MMAP  0x40000000      /* PFNMAP vma that is fully mapped at mmap time */
> is only used under special situation.
> 
> etc..
> 
> They'll be able to be moved to other(new) flag field, IIUC.

I'm working on a patch to do this, and am looking at is_mergeable_vma,
which is invoked via can_vma_merge_after from vma_merge from
madvise_behaviour (which potentially modifies these hint flags). Should
those hints be considered in that function? (Do I need to pass the hints
in as well and check they're equal?)

By the way, VM_ClearReadHint and VM_NormalReadHint are currently unused.
 madvise_behaviour manipulates the flags directly (in preparing
potential replacement values). Not sure if something should be done
about that.

By the way #2, in response to the later message in this thread, I'm
calling the new var vma->vm_hints, and have put it at the end of the
struct at the moment. Is that a good place?

Regards,

Nigel

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-28 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4AB9A0D6.1090004@crca.org.au>
2009-09-23 20:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-25  8:30   ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 11:36     ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-25 11:47       ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-30 12:02     ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-30 13:08       ` swsusp on nommu, was 'Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.' Johannes Weiner
2009-09-30 16:06         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-09-24  1:05 ` No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:34   ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25  8:40     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:48       ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 21:09         ` Joerg Roedel
2009-09-28  2:45       ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2009-09-28  3:04         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28  3:36           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-28  3:57             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28  4:37               ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28  4:51                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-28  4:53                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28  5:22                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28  5:32                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 21:21                 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 21:33                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 15:38               ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 16:14                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 21:00                   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 21:22                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-29  1:57                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29 14:22                       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-01 10:54                         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-01 13:47                           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-01 11:38                       ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-02  0:42                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02  1:37                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02  2:39                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AC0234F.2080808@crca.org.au \
    --to=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox