From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:45:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC0234F.2080808@crca.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090925174009.79778649.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:34:56 +1000
> Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>>> I have some code in TuxOnIce that needs a bit too (explicitly mark the
>>>> VMA as needing to be atomically copied, for GEM objects), and am not
>>>> sure what the canonical way to proceed is. Should a new unsigned long be
>>>> added? The difficulty I see with that is that my flag was used in
>>>> shmem_file_setup's flags parameter (drm_gem_object_alloc), so that
>>>> function would need an extra parameter too..
>>> Hmm, how about adding vma->vm_flags2 ?
>> The difficulty there is that some functions pass these flags as arguments.
>>
> Ah yes. But I wonder some special flags, which is rarey used, can be moved
> to vm_flags2...
>
> For example,
>
> #define VM_SEQ_READ 0x00008000 /* App will access data sequentially */
> #define VM_RAND_READ 0x00010000 /* App will not benefit from clustered reads */
> are all capsuled under
> mm.h
> 117 #define VM_READHINTMASK (VM_SEQ_READ | VM_RAND_READ)
> 118 #define VM_ClearReadHint(v) (v)->vm_flags &= ~VM_READHINTMASK
> 119 #define VM_NormalReadHint(v) (!((v)->vm_flags & VM_READHINTMASK))
> 120 #define VM_SequentialReadHint(v) ((v)->vm_flags & VM_SEQ_READ)
> 121 #define VM_RandomReadHint(v) ((v)->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ)
>
> Or
>
> 105 #define VM_PFN_AT_MMAP 0x40000000 /* PFNMAP vma that is fully mapped at mmap time */
> is only used under special situation.
>
> etc..
>
> They'll be able to be moved to other(new) flag field, IIUC.
I'm working on a patch to do this, and am looking at is_mergeable_vma,
which is invoked via can_vma_merge_after from vma_merge from
madvise_behaviour (which potentially modifies these hint flags). Should
those hints be considered in that function? (Do I need to pass the hints
in as well and check they're equal?)
By the way, VM_ClearReadHint and VM_NormalReadHint are currently unused.
madvise_behaviour manipulates the flags directly (in preparing
potential replacement values). Not sure if something should be done
about that.
By the way #2, in response to the later message in this thread, I'm
calling the new var vma->vm_hints, and have put it at the end of the
struct at the moment. Is that a good place?
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-28 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4AB9A0D6.1090004@crca.org.au>
2009-09-23 20:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-25 8:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 11:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-25 11:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-30 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-30 13:08 ` swsusp on nommu, was 'Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.' Johannes Weiner
2009-09-30 16:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-09-24 1:05 ` No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25 8:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 8:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25 8:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 21:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-09-28 2:45 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2009-09-28 3:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 3:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-28 3:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 4:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 4:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-28 4:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 5:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 5:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 21:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 21:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 15:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 16:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 21:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 21:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-29 1:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29 14:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-01 10:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-01 13:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-01 11:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-02 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02 1:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02 2:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC0234F.2080808@crca.org.au \
--to=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox