Re: [PATCH] replace various uses of num_physpages by totalram_pages

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>]

>>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 18.08.09 17:38 >>>
>
>* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
>> Sizing of memory allocations shouldn't depend on the number of 
>> physical pages found in a system, as that generally includes 
>> (perhaps a huge amount of) non-RAM pages. The amount of what 
>> actually is usable as storage should instead be used as a basis 
>> here.
>> 
>> Some of the calculations (i.e. those not intending to use high 
>> memory) should likely even use (totalram_pages - 
>> totalhigh_pages).
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
>> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>> 
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c  |    4 ++--
>
>Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
>Just curious: how did you find this bug? Did you find this by 
>experiencing problems on a system with a lot of declared non-RAM 
>memory?

Actually, I noticed this on Xen (non-pv-ops) when booting a domain with
a sufficiently large initial balloon. Under that condition, booting would
frequently fail due to various table sizes being calculated way too large.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>