From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 200726B005A for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:14:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A818A39.3000201@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:11:53 -0400 From: Prarit Bhargava MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Help Resource Counters Scale better (v4) References: <20090811144405.GW7176@balbir.in.ibm.com> <4A81863A.2050504@redhat.com> <20090811150057.GY7176@balbir.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20090811150057.GY7176@balbir.in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , KOSAKI Motohiro , "menage@google.com" , andi.kleen@intel.com, Pavel Emelianov , "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: >> > > Without the patch and RESOURCE_COUNTERS do you see a big overhead. I'd > assume so, I am seeing it on my 24 way box that I have access to. > I see a *huge* overhead: real 27m8.988s user 87m24.916s sys 382m6.037s P. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org