From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"MASON,CHRISTOPHER" <CHRIS.MASON@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bump up nr_to_write in xfs_vm_writepage
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:29:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4D26C5.9070606@redhat.com> (raw)
Talking w/ someone who had a raid6 of 15 drives on an areca
controller, he wondered why he could only get 300MB/s or so
out of a streaming buffered write to xfs like so:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/storage/10gbfile bs=128k count=81920
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 34.294 s, 313 MB/s
when the same write directly to the device was going closer
to 700MB/s...
With the following change things get moving again for xfs:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/storage/10gbfile bs=128k count=81920
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 16.2938 s, 659 MB/s
Chris had sent out something similar at Christoph's suggestion,
and Christoph reminded me of it, and I tested it a variant of
it, and it seems to help shockingly well.
Feels like a bandaid though; thoughts? Other tests to do?
Thanks,
-Eric
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
---
Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
@@ -1268,6 +1268,13 @@ xfs_vm_writepage(
if (!page_has_buffers(page))
create_empty_buffers(page, 1 << inode->i_blkbits, 0);
+
+ /*
+ * VM calculation for nr_to_write seems off. Bump it way
+ * up, this gets simple streaming writes zippy again.
+ */
+ wbc->nr_to_write *= 4;
+
/*
* Convert delayed allocate, unwritten or unmapped space
* to real space and flush out to disk.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2009-07-02 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-02 21:29 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-07-07 9:07 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-07 10:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-07 10:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-09 2:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09 13:01 ` Chris Mason
2009-07-10 7:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-24 5:20 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-07-24 5:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-24 12:05 ` Chris Mason
2009-07-07 11:37 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-07 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-07 15:17 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4D26C5.9070606@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=CHRIS.MASON@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox