From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Larry H." <research@subreption.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use kzfree in tty buffer management to enforce data sanitization
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 20:17:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A22BB99.1070104@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905311002010.3435@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Linus,
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>> memset(buf->data, 0, N_TTY_BUF_SIZE);
>>>> if (PAGE_SIZE != N_TTY_BUF_SIZE)
>>>> kfree(...)
>>>> else
>>>> free_page(...)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> but quite frankly, I'm not convinced about these patches at all.
>>> I wonder why the tty code has that N_TTY_BUF_SIZE special casing in
>>> the first place? I think we can probably just get rid of it and thus
>>> we can use kzfree() here if we want to.
>> Some platforms with very large page sizes override the use of page based
>> allocators (eg older ARM would go around allocating 32K). The normal path
>> is 4K or 8K page sized buffers.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think Pekka meant the other way around - why don't we always just use
> kmalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE)/kfree(), and drop the whole conditional "use page
> allocator" entirely?
>
> I suspect the "use page allocator" is historical - ie the tty layer
> originally always did that, and then when people wanted to suppotr smaller
> areas than one page, they added the special case. I have this dim memory
> of the _original_ kmalloc not handling page-sized allocations well (due to
> embedded size/pointer overheads), but I think all current allocators are
> perfectly happy to allocate PAGE_SIZE buffers without slop.
>
> If I'm right, then we could just use kmalloc/kfree unconditionally. Pekka?
Yup, that's what I meant. Even SLAB moves metadata off-slab to make sure
we support PAGE_SIZE allocations nicely. SLUB even used to pass
kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE) directly to the page allocator and will likely do
that again once Mel Gorman's page allocator optimization patches hit
mainline.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-31 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-31 1:55 Larry H.
2009-05-31 2:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-31 2:35 ` Larry H.
2009-05-31 6:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-31 6:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-31 10:26 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-31 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-31 17:10 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-31 17:17 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-06-02 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A22BB99.1070104@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=research@subreption.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox