linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm, zone: track number of pages in free area by migratetype
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:04:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49ed7412-eab7-4d8d-c6df-fdf76d98da4d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611161731350.17379@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On 11/17/2016 02:32 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> Each zone's free_area tracks the number of free pages for all free lists.
> This does not allow the number of free pages for a specific migratetype
> to be determined without iterating its free list.
> 
> An upcoming change will use this information to preclude doing async
> memory compaction when the number of MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE pageblocks is
> below a certain threshold.
> 
> The total number of free pages is still tracked, however, to not make
> zone_watermark_ok() more expensive.  Reading /proc/pagetypeinfo, however,
> is faster.

Yeah I've already seen a case with /proc/pagetypeinfo causing soft
lockups due to high number of iterations...

> This patch introduces no functional change and increases the amount of
> per-zone metadata at worst by 48 bytes per memory zone (when CONFIG_CMA
> and CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION are enabled).

Isn't it 48 bytes per zone and order?

> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

I'd be for this if there are no performance regressions. It affects hot
paths and increases cache footprint. I think at least some allocator
intensive microbenchmark should be used.

Vlastimil

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-17 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-17  1:32 David Rientjes
2016-11-17  1:32 ` [patch 2/2] mm, compaction: avoid async compaction if most free memory is ineligible David Rientjes
2016-11-17 17:04 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-11-17 22:11   ` [patch 1/2] mm, zone: track number of pages in free area by migratetype David Rientjes
2016-11-18 20:58     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-30  0:16 ` [patch v2 1/2] mm, zone: track number of movable free pages David Rientjes
2016-11-30  0:16   ` [patch v2 2/2] mm, compaction: avoid async compaction if most free memory is ineligible David Rientjes
2016-11-30  7:34   ` [patch v2 1/2] mm, zone: track number of movable free pages Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49ed7412-eab7-4d8d-c6df-fdf76d98da4d@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox