Re: [PATCH} - There appears to be a minor race condition in sched.c

[Piet Delaney <piet.delaney@tensilica.com>]

Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Piet Delaney <piet.delaney@tensilica.com> [2009-03-25 20:46:11]:
> 
>> Ingo, Peter:
>>
>> There appears to be a minor race condition in sched.c where
>> you can get a division by zero. I suspect that it only shows
>> up when the kernel is compiled without optimization and the code
>> loads rq->nr_running from memory twice.
>>
>> It's part of our SMP stabilization changes that I just posted to:
>>
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/piet/xtensa-2.6.27-smp.git
>>
>> I mentioned it to Johannes the other day and he suggested passing it on to you ASAP.
>>
> 
> The latest version uses ACCESS_ONCE to get rq->nr_running and then
> uses that value. I am not sure what version you are talking about, if
> it is older, you should consider backporting from the current version.

Hi Balbir:

It appears that Steven Rostedt changed cpu_ave_load_per_task() to use a local
variable nr_running, just as I suggested, apparently back in 2.6.28-rc5
last Nov; well after the 2.6.27 that I mentioned above.

A few days later Ingo added the ACCESS_ONCE() after Linus pointed out
that nothing prevented the compiler from reloading rg->rn_running.
Linus was right, adding the volatile is necessary to prevent gcc
from doing forward substitution.

I'll check Linus's current repo next time before suggesting bug fixes.

-piet

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>