From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] vm_unmap_aliases: allow callers to inhibit TLB flush
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:57:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <499B32E4.4080501@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812301442.37654.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> I have patches to move the tlb flushing to an asynchronous process context...
> but all tweaks to that (including flushing at vmap) are just variations on the
> existing flushing scheme and don't solve your problem, so I don't think we
> really need to change that for the moment (my patches are mainly for latency
> improvement and to allow vunmap to be usable from interrupt context).
>
Hi Nick,
I'm very interested in being able to call vm_unmap_aliases() from
interrupt context. Does the work you mention here encompass that?
For Xen dom0, when someone does something like dma_alloc_coherent, we
allocate the memory as normal, and then swizzle the underlying physical
pages to be machine physically contiguous (vs contiguous pseudo-physical
guest memory), and within the addressable range for the device. In
order to do that, we need to make sure the pages are only mapped by the
linear mapping, and there are no other aliases.
And since drivers are free to allocate dma memory at interrupt time,
this needs to happen at interrupt time too.
(The tlb flush issue that started this read should be a non-issue for
Xen, at least, because all cross-cpu tlb flushes should happen via a
hypercall rather than kernel-initiated IPIs, so there's no possibility
of deadlock. Though I'll happily admit that taking advantage of the
implementation properties of a particular implementation is not very
pretty...)
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-17 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-11 19:05 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-24 0:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-12 1:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-24 1:40 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-16 1:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-12-30 3:42 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-30 11:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-17 21:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-02-19 11:54 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 17:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-19 17:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 19:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-23 4:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-23 7:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-23 9:13 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-23 19:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-24 12:23 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=499B32E4.4080501@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox