Re: [-mm patch] Show memcg information during OOM

[Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>]

David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
>>>> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
>>>> index d3b9bac..b8e53ae 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
>>>> @@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
>>>>  			current->comm, gfp_mask, order, current->oomkilladj);
>>>>  		task_lock(current);
>>>>  		cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(current);
>>>> +		mem_cgroup_print_mem_info(mem);
>>> I think this can be put outside the task lock. The lock is used to call task_cs() safely in
>>> cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed().
>>>
>> Thanks, I'll work on that in the next version.
>>  
> 
> I was also wondering about this and assumed that it was necessary to 
> prevent the cgroup from disappearing during the oom.  If task_lock() isn't 
> held, is the memcg->css.cgroup->dentry->d_name.name dereference always 
> safe without rcu?
> 

The cgroup won't disappear, since mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() is called with memcg's css refcnt
increased. :)


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>