From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: dipankar@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm3
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 12:49:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49830000.1052509765@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030509141012.GD2059@in.ibm.com>
> I am wondering what we should do with this patch. The RCU stats display
> the #s of RCU requests and actual updates on each CPU. On a normal system
> they don't mean much to a sysadmin, so I am not sure if it is the right
> thing to include this feature. OTOH, it is extremely useful to detect
> potential memory leaks happening due to, say a CPU looping in
> kernel (and RCU not happening consequently). Will a CONFIG_RCU_DEBUG
> make it more palatable for mainline ?
I'd find that useful - if it has a measurable overhead. If not, just leave
it on all the time ;-)
M.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-09 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-08 8:39 2.5.69-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-05-09 14:10 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2003-05-09 19:49 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-05-09 21:18 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 20:13 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Bill Davidsen
2003-05-09 14:53 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 15:37 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 17:55 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:12 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:15 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:54 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='49830000.1052509765@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox