* Re: [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure
[not found] <4975F376.4010506@suse.com>
@ 2009-01-27 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 21:44 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-01-27 21:49 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-01-27 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Mahoney; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Pekka Enberg
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:26 -0500
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The SLAB kmalloc with a constant value isn't consistent with the other
> implementations because it bails out with __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much
> rather than returning NULL and properly allowing the caller to fall back
> to vmalloc or take other action. This doesn't happen with a non-constant
> value or with SLOB or SLUB.
>
> Starting with 2.6.28, I've been seeing build failures on s390x. This is
> due to init_section_page_cgroup trying to allocate 2.5MB when the max
> size for a kmalloc on s390x is 2MB.
>
> It's failing because the value is constant. The workarounds at the call
> size are ugly and the caller shouldn't have to change behavior depending
> on what the backend of the API is.
>
> So, this patch eliminates the link failure and returns NULL like the
> other implementations.
>
OK by me, is that's what the other sl[abcd...xyz]b.c implementations
do.
That __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() thing has frequently been a PITA
anyway - some gcc versions flub the constant_p() test and end up
referencing __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() when the callsite was
passing a variable `size' arg.
> - ---
> include/linux/slab_def.h | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> - --- a/include/linux/slab_def.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab_def.h
> @@ -43,10 +43,7 @@ static inline void *kmalloc(size_t size,
> i++;
> #include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h>
> #undef CACHE
> - - {
> - - extern void __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much(void);
> - - __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much();
> - - }
> + return NULL;
> found:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> if (flags & GFP_DMA)
> @@ -77,10 +74,7 @@ static inline void *kmalloc_node(size_t
> i++;
> #include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h>
> #undef CACHE
> - - {
> - - extern void __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much(void);
> - - __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much();
> - - }
> + return NULL;
> found:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> if (flags & GFP_DMA)
>
Strange patch format, but it applied.
I'll punt this patch in the Pekka direction.
Do you think we should include it in 2.6.28.x?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure
2009-01-27 21:37 ` [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure Andrew Morton
@ 2009-01-27 21:44 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-01-27 21:49 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Mahoney @ 2009-01-27 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Pekka Enberg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Strange patch format, but it applied.
Ugh, sorry about that. I forgot to disable the GPG signing. It escapes
- -'s like that.
> I'll punt this patch in the Pekka direction.
>
> Do you think we should include it in 2.6.28.x?
I think so. It's a corner case, but does fix a build failure.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkl/gCcACgkQLPWxlyuTD7IdcwCgkdOmH3P8a9q1RQYsOcCkG8C0
TYsAn3rEJMROguhVqbWuFlzg58t+vVEL
=RM/e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure
2009-01-27 21:37 ` [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 21:44 ` Jeff Mahoney
@ 2009-01-27 21:49 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-01-27 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Jeff Mahoney, torvalds, linux-kernel, linux-mm
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:26 -0500
> Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> The SLAB kmalloc with a constant value isn't consistent with the other
>> implementations because it bails out with __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much
>> rather than returning NULL and properly allowing the caller to fall back
>> to vmalloc or take other action. This doesn't happen with a non-constant
>> value or with SLOB or SLUB.
>>
>> Starting with 2.6.28, I've been seeing build failures on s390x. This is
>> due to init_section_page_cgroup trying to allocate 2.5MB when the max
>> size for a kmalloc on s390x is 2MB.
>>
>> It's failing because the value is constant. The workarounds at the call
>> size are ugly and the caller shouldn't have to change behavior depending
>> on what the backend of the API is.
>>
>> So, this patch eliminates the link failure and returns NULL like the
>> other implementations.
>>
>
> OK by me, is that's what the other sl[abcd...xyz]b.c implementations
> do.
>
> That __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() thing has frequently been a PITA
> anyway - some gcc versions flub the constant_p() test and end up
> referencing __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() when the callsite was
> passing a variable `size' arg.
[snip]
> Strange patch format, but it applied.
>
> I'll punt this patch in the Pekka direction.
Applied, thanks!
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-27 21:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <4975F376.4010506@suse.com>
2009-01-27 21:37 ` [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 21:44 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-01-27 21:49 ` Pekka Enberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox