From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:49:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497F8172.7000403@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090127133723.46eb7035.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:26 -0500
> Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> The SLAB kmalloc with a constant value isn't consistent with the other
>> implementations because it bails out with __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much
>> rather than returning NULL and properly allowing the caller to fall back
>> to vmalloc or take other action. This doesn't happen with a non-constant
>> value or with SLOB or SLUB.
>>
>> Starting with 2.6.28, I've been seeing build failures on s390x. This is
>> due to init_section_page_cgroup trying to allocate 2.5MB when the max
>> size for a kmalloc on s390x is 2MB.
>>
>> It's failing because the value is constant. The workarounds at the call
>> size are ugly and the caller shouldn't have to change behavior depending
>> on what the backend of the API is.
>>
>> So, this patch eliminates the link failure and returns NULL like the
>> other implementations.
>>
>
> OK by me, is that's what the other sl[abcd...xyz]b.c implementations
> do.
>
> That __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() thing has frequently been a PITA
> anyway - some gcc versions flub the constant_p() test and end up
> referencing __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() when the callsite was
> passing a variable `size' arg.
[snip]
> Strange patch format, but it applied.
>
> I'll punt this patch in the Pekka direction.
Applied, thanks!
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4975F376.4010506@suse.com>
2009-01-27 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 21:44 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-01-27 21:49 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497F8172.7000403@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox