From: Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] acpi: do not use kmem caches
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:48:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4933F925.3020907@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812010828150.14977@quilx.com>
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>
>> Why do you think Nick's patch is going to _increase_ memory consumption?
>> SLUB _already_ merges the ACPI caches with kmalloc caches so you won't
>> see any difference there. For SLAB, it's a gain because there's not
>> enough activity going on which results in lots of unused space in the
>> slabs (which is, btw, the reason SLUB does slab merging in the first
>> place).
>>
>
> The patch is going to increase memory consumption because the use of
> the kmalloc array means that the allocated object sizes are rounded up to
> the next power of two.
>
> I would recommend to keep the caches. Subsystem specific caches help to
> simplify debugging and track the memory allocated for various purposes in
> addition to saving the rounding up to power of two overhead.
> And with SLUB the creation of such caches usually does not require
> additional memory.
>
> Maybe it would be best to avoid kmalloc as much as possible.
>
>
Christoph,
Thanks for support, these were my thoughts, when I changed ACPICA to use
kmem_cache instead of
it's own on top of kmalloc 4 years ago...
Here are two acpi caches on my thinkpad z61m, IMHO any laptop will show
similar numbers:
aystarik@thinkpad:~$ cat /proc/slabinfo | grep Acpi
Acpi-ParseExt 2856 2856 72 56 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 51 51 0
Acpi-Parse 170 170 48 85 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
Size of first will become 96 and size of second will be 64 if kmalloc is
used, and we don't count ACPICA internal overhead.
Number of used blocks is not smallest in the list of slabs, actually it
is among the highest.
Regards,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-01 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-01 8:31 Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 11:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-01 12:00 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 13:12 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 13:36 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 14:14 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 16:32 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-01 17:32 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 13:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-01 14:02 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 16:14 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 16:45 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 16:58 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 17:20 ` Moore, Robert
2008-12-01 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-01 17:32 ` Moore, Robert
2008-12-01 17:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-01 17:49 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 17:53 ` Len Brown
2008-12-01 18:10 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-31 22:04 ` Len Brown
2009-01-05 4:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 5:43 ` Skywing
2009-01-05 6:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-01 14:48 ` Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
2008-12-01 16:20 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 17:04 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 17:12 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 17:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-01 17:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-01 17:36 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 17:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-01 18:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-01 17:43 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-01 17:31 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4933F925.3020907@gmail.com \
--to=aystarik@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox