From: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
edwintorok@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1][PATCH]page_fault retry with NOPAGE_RETRY
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:10:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492EF0C2.4090108@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227780007.4454.1344.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 01:28 -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
>
>> Correct. I don't recall the numbers from the pathelogical cases we were
>> seeing, but iirc, it was on the order of 10s of seconds, likely
>> exascerbated by slower than usual disks. I've been digging through my
>> inbox to find numbers without much success -- we've been using a variant
>> of this patch since 2.6.11.
>
>> We generally try to avoid such things, but sometimes it a) can't be
>> easily avoided (third party libraries for instance) and b) when it hits
>> us, it affects the overall health of the machine/cluster (the monitoring
>> daemons get blocked, which isn't very healthy).
>
> If its only monitoring, there might be another solution. If you can keep
> the required data in a separate (approximate) copy so that you don't
> need mmap_sem at all to show them.
>
> If your mmap_sem is so contended your latencies are unacceptable, adding
> more users to it - even statistics gathering, just isn't going to cure
> the situation.
>
> Furthermore, /proc code usually isn't written with performance in mind,
> so its usually simple and robust code. Adding it to a 'hot'-path like
> you're doing doesn't seem advisable.
>
> Also, releasing and re-acquiring mmap_sem can significantly add to the
> cacheline bouncing that thing already has.
>
This is much less of a worry. We expect to be able to look at these
things on the order of 1HZ, so cacheline bouncing becomes negligible.
Latency to lock acquire however hurts and is silly considering it's just
another reader. Our monitoring software here is acting as a litmus test
and the real pain is felt by other threads in the same process who are
also blocked trying to acquire the read lock.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-27 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-22 6:47 Ying Han
2008-11-22 7:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-23 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-23 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-25 18:42 ` Ying Han
2008-11-26 12:32 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-26 19:57 ` Mike Waychison
2008-11-27 8:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 9:28 ` Mike Waychison
2008-11-27 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 10:14 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 19:22 ` Mike Waychison
2008-11-28 9:41 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-28 22:46 ` Mike Waychison
2008-11-27 11:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-27 19:10 ` Mike Waychison [this message]
2008-11-27 11:39 ` Török Edwin
2008-11-27 12:03 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 12:21 ` Török Edwin
2008-11-27 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 12:39 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 12:52 ` Török Edwin
2008-11-27 13:05 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 13:10 ` Török Edwin
2008-11-27 13:12 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 13:23 ` Török Edwin
2008-11-28 12:10 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-30 19:38 ` Török Edwin
2008-12-01 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 11:13 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 11:37 ` Török Edwin
2008-12-04 22:27 ` Ying Han
2008-12-05 6:50 ` Török Edwin
2008-11-27 13:08 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 19:03 ` Mike Waychison
2008-11-28 9:37 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-28 23:02 ` Mike Waychison
2008-11-30 19:54 ` Török Edwin
2008-12-01 4:50 ` Mike Waychison
2008-12-01 8:58 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01 11:45 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492EF0C2.4090108@google.com \
--to=mikew@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=edwintorok@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox