Re: [RFC][mm] [PATCH 3/4] Memory cgroup hierarchical reclaim (v3)

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:40:13 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> I think of it as easy to update - as in the modularity, you can plug out
>> hierarchical reclaim easily and implement your own hierarchical reclaim.
>>
> When I do so, I'll rewrite all, again.
> 

I don't intend to ask you to rewrite it, rewrite all, I meant you as in a
generic person. With hierarchy we will need weighted reclaim, which I'll add in
later.

>>> Can you make this code iterative rather than recursive ?
>>>
>>> I don't like this kind of recursive call with complexed lock/unlock.
>> I tried an iterative version, which ended up looking very ugly. I think the
>> recursive version is easier to understand. What we do is a DFS walk - pretty
>> standard algorithm.
>>
> But recursive one is not good for search-and-try algorithm.

OK, I'll post the iterative algorithm, but it is going to be dirty :)

-- 
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>