From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f198.google.com (mail-qt0-f198.google.com [209.85.216.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43796B0025 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-f198.google.com with SMTP id k22so7585732qtj.0 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com (hqemgate15.nvidia.com. [216.228.121.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w63si1571046qkd.397.2018.03.16.14.40.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] mm/hmm: fix header file if/else/endif maze References: <20180316191414.3223-1-jglisse@redhat.com> <20180316191414.3223-3-jglisse@redhat.com> <20180316140959.b603888e2a9ba2e42e56ba1f@linux-foundation.org> <20180316211801.GB4861@redhat.com> <20180316143537.0d49a76ec48ec0ab034af93b@linux-foundation.org> From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <48f31a69-c4f8-5e50-00e8-0def08f750a3@nvidia.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:40:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180316143537.0d49a76ec48ec0ab034af93b@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton , Jerome Glisse Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Ralph Campbell , Evgeny Baskakov On 03/16/2018 02:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:18:02 -0400 Jerome Glisse wro= te: >=20 >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:09:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:14:07 -0400 jglisse@redhat.com wrote: >>> >>>> From: J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Glisse >>>> >>>> The #if/#else/#endif for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HMM) were wrong. >>> >>> "were wrong" is not a sufficient explanation of the problem, especially >>> if we're requesting a -stable backport. Please fully describe the >>> effects of a bug when fixing it? >> >> Build issue (compilation failure) if you have multiple includes of >> hmm.h through different headers is the most obvious issue. So it >> will be very obvious with any big driver that include the file in >> different headers. >=20 > That doesn't seem to warrant a -stable backport? The developer of such > a driver will simply fix the headers? Right. For this patch, I would strongly request a -stable backport. It's=20 really going to cause problems if anyone tries to use -stable with HMM, without this fix. thanks, --=20 John Hubbard NVIDIA >=20 >> I can respin with that. Sorry again for not being more explanatory >> it is always hard for me to figure what is not obvious to others. >=20 > I updated the changelog, no respin needed. >=20