linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 1/7] x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 09:06:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48f2779d-bc62-c7f5-c40e-7238a16b90fb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91011a66-b125-b445-1486-bada8e06b994@csgroup.eu>



在 2022/5/2 22:24, Christophe Leroy 写道:
> 
> 
> Le 20/04/2022 à 05:04, Tong Tiangen a écrit :
>> x86/powerpc has it's implementation of copy_mc_to_user but not use #define
>> to declare.
>>
>> This may cause problems, for example, if other architectures open
>> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC, but want to use copy_mc_to_user() outside the
>> architecture, the code add to include/linux/uaddess.h is as follows:
>>
>>       #ifndef copy_mc_to_user
>>       static inline unsigned long __must_check
>>       copy_mc_to_user(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt)
>>       {
>> 	    ...
>>       }
>>       #endif
>>
>> Then this definition will conflict with the implementation of x86/powerpc
>> and cause compilation errors as follow:
>>
>> Fixes: ec6347bb4339 ("x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}()")
> 
> I don't understand, what does it fix really ? What was the
> (existing/real) bug introduced by that patch and that your are fixing ?
> 
> If those defined had been expected and missing, we would have had a
> build failure. If you have one, can you describe it ?

There will be build failure after patch 3 is added, there is a little
confusing for a reader of this commit in isolation.
In the next version, I will put this patch after patch 3.

Thanks,
Tong.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
>>    arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 1 +
>>    2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> index 9b82b38ff867..58dbe8e2e318 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ copy_mc_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>>    
>>    	return n;
>>    }
>> +#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
>>    #endif
>>    
>>    extern long __copy_from_user_flushcache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> index f78e2b3501a1..e18c5f098025 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ copy_mc_to_kernel(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
>>    
>>    unsigned long __must_check
>>    copy_mc_to_user(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
>> +#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
>>    #endif
>>    
>>    /*


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-03  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20  3:04 [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 1/7] x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user Tong Tiangen
2022-04-22  9:45   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-24  1:16     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-02 14:24   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-03  1:06     ` Tong Tiangen [this message]
2022-05-05  1:21       ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 2/7] arm64: fix types in copy_highpage() Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 3/7] arm64: add support for machine check error safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:26   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19  6:29     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-25  8:30       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  3:36         ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-26  9:50           ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-27  1:40             ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 4/7] arm64: add copy_{to, from}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-04 10:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05  6:39     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 13:41       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 14:33         ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19  6:53     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 5/7] arm64: mte: Clean up user tag accessors Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:36   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 6/7] arm64: add {get, put}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:39   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19  7:09     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 7/7] arm64: add cow " Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:44   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 10:38     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-27  9:09 ` [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support Tong Tiangen
2022-05-04 19:58 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
2022-05-16 18:45 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48f2779d-bc62-c7f5-c40e-7238a16b90fb@huawei.com \
    --to=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox