linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, shuah@kernel.org, pfalcato@suse.de,
	david@redhat.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, donettom@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] selftests/mm: Add support to test 4PB VA on PPC64
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 20:14:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48b7cc42-e5b9-4103-85f2-7a33543329a9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FA05361-1FA8-4CAA-AF23-7BB0974DA78B@nvidia.com>


On 03/07/25 8:11 pm, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2025, at 2:06, Aboorva Devarajan wrote:
>
>> From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> PowerPC64 supports a 4PB virtual address space, but this test was
>> previously limited to 512TB. This patch extends the coverage up to
>> the full 4PB VA range on PowerPC64.
>>
>> Memory from 0 to 128TB is allocated without an address hint, while
>> allocations from 128TB to 4PB use a hint address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
>> index e24c36a39f22..619acf0b9239 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
>>   #define NR_CHUNKS_256TB   (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 2UL)
>>   #define NR_CHUNKS_384TB   (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 3UL)
>>   #define NR_CHUNKS_3840TB  (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 30UL)
>> +#define NR_CHUNKS_3968TB  (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 31UL)
>>
>>   #define ADDR_MARK_128TB  (1UL << 47) /* First address beyond 128TB */
>>   #define ADDR_MARK_256TB  (1UL << 48) /* First address beyond 256TB */
>> @@ -59,6 +60,11 @@
>>   #define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 49
>>   #define NR_CHUNKS_LOW   NR_CHUNKS_256TB
>>   #define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH  NR_CHUNKS_3840TB
>> +#elif defined(__PPC64__)
>> +#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK  ADDR_MARK_128TB
>> +#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 48
>> +#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW   NR_CHUNKS_128TB
>> +#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH  NR_CHUNKS_3968TB
>>   #else
>>   #define HIGH_ADDR_MARK  ADDR_MARK_128TB
>>   #define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 48
> Could you also update the comment above this code to say PowerPC64 also
> supports 4PB virtual address space?
>
>  From the comment, arm64 supports 4PB but its NR_CHUNKS_HIGH is only 3840TB,
> whereas PowerPC64 here can get to 3968TB. I do not know why arm64’s
> 4PB is smaller. ;)

The border for high VA space is 128 TB for x86 and ppc, for arm64 it
is 256 TB.

>
> Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-03 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-03  6:06 [PATCH v2 0/7] selftests/mm: Fix false positives and skip unsupported tests Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm/selftests: Fix incorrect pointer being passed to mark_range() Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  7:59   ` Dev Jain
2025-07-03  8:03   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03 14:33   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] selftests/mm: Add support to test 4PB VA on PPC64 Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  8:05   ` Dev Jain
2025-07-03  8:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03 14:41   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03 14:44     ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-07-03 14:53       ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03 14:50     ` Donet Tom
2025-07-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] selftest/mm: Fix ksm_funtional_test failures Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/selftests: Fix split_huge_page_test failure on systems with 64KB page size Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  8:15   ` Dev Jain
2025-07-03  8:22   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03  8:58     ` Donet Tom
2025-07-03 14:21       ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03 14:30         ` Donet Tom
2025-07-03 14:30   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03 14:52     ` Donet Tom
2025-07-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] selftests/mm: Fix child process exit codes in ksm_functional_tests Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  8:29   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03  8:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03  8:51     ` Donet Tom
2025-07-03  9:14       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03 14:31         ` Donet Tom
2025-07-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] selftests/mm: Skip thuge-gen if shmmax is too small or no 1G huge pages Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  8:21   ` Dev Jain
2025-07-03  8:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03 14:43   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] selftests/mm: Skip hugepage-mremap test if userfaultfd unavailable Aboorva Devarajan
2025-07-03  8:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03 14:52     ` Zi Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48b7cc42-e5b9-4103-85f2-7a33543329a9@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox