linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [memcg BUG] unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derefence at 00000000
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:59:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FDBD18.6090100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081021202325.938678c0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:19:51 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
>> * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Oh! thanks...but it seems pc->page is NULL in the middle of ZONE_NORMAL..
>>>> ==
>>>>  Normal   0x00001000 -> 0x000373fe
>>>> ==
>>>> This is appearently in the range of page_cgroup initialization.
>>>> (if pgdat->node_page_cgroup is initalized correctly...)
>>>>
>>>> I think write to page_cgroup->page happens only at initialization.
>>>> Hmm ? not initilization failure but curruption ?
>>>>
>>> Yes, curruption. I didn't find informatation about initialization failure.
>>>
>>>> What happens if replacing __alloc_bootmem() with vmalloc() in page_cgroup.c init ?
>>>>
>>> So I did this change, and the box booted up without any problem.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
>>> index 5d86550..82a30b1 100644
>>> --- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
>>> @@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ static int __init alloc_node_page_cgroup(int nid)
>>>  
>>>  	table_size = sizeof(struct page_cgroup) * nr_pages;
>>>  
>>> -	base = __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic(NODE_DATA(nid),
>>> -			table_size, PAGE_SIZE, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
>>> +	base = vmalloc_node(table_size, nid);
>>>  	if (!base)
>>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>> i have this:
>>
>>   CONFIG_FAILSLAB=y
>>   CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC=y
>>   # CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST is not set
>>   CONFIG_FAIL_IO_TIMEOUT=y
>>
>> so the bug was perhaps that the __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() failed 
>> and this code continued silently? vmalloc_node() probably is more 
>> agressive about allocating memory.
>>
> Sorry. I think I cannot use alloc_bootmem() at this point because
> it's too late in init-path. (we can use usual page allocator)
> So, just replacing alloc_bootmem() with vmalloc_node() is a fix....

Kamezawa-San,

I would prefer to use alloc_bootmem() instead of vmalloc_node(). May be we can
shift cgroups, so that we use early_init for allocating page_cgroups.  What do
you think?

-- 
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-21 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-17 10:48 [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/5] mem+swap resource controller(trial patch) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-17 10:56 ` [PATCH -mm 1/5] memcg: replace res_counter Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-20 19:53   ` Paul Menage
2008-10-21  1:14     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  1:29       ` Paul Menage
2008-10-21  1:49         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  2:15           ` Paul Menage
2008-10-21  2:50             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  2:20           ` Paul Menage
2008-10-21  3:03             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  6:30               ` Paul Menage
2008-10-21  5:30       ` Balbir Singh
2008-10-21  5:39         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  6:20           ` [memcg BUG] unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derefence at 00000000 Li Zefan
2008-10-21  6:25             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  6:28               ` Li Zefan
2008-10-21  6:38                 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-21  6:54             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  7:04               ` Li Zefan
2008-10-21  7:16                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  7:21                   ` Li Zefan
2008-10-21  8:18                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  8:34                       ` Mel Gorman
2008-10-21  8:38                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  8:35                       ` Li Zefan
2008-10-21  8:36                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  8:57                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  9:13                           ` Li Zefan
2008-10-21  9:25                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21  9:54                               ` Li Zefan
2008-10-21 10:14                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 10:57                                   ` Li Zefan
2008-10-21 11:00                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 11:09                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 11:13                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 11:19                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-21 11:23                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 11:28                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-21 11:32                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 11:38                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22  2:13                                             ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-22  2:31                                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 11:29                                         ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-10-21 11:34                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 12:00                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 12:14                                             ` Balbir Singh
2008-10-21 13:09                                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 13:25                                                 ` Balbir Singh
2008-10-21 13:34                                                 ` Balbir Singh
2008-10-21 13:44                                                   ` [memcg BUG] unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derefence at00000000 亀澤 寛之
2008-10-21 10:58                                   ` [memcg BUG] unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derefence at 00000000 Balbir Singh
2008-10-21  9:33                           ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-21  9:41                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-21 10:15                               ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-17 10:59 ` [PATCH -mm 2/5] memcg: mem_cgroup private ID Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-17 11:01 ` [PATCH -mm 3/5] memcg: mem+swap controller Kconfig Daisuke Nishimura, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-17 11:04 ` [PATCH -mm 4/5] memcg: mem+swap counter Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-17 11:06 ` [PATCH -mm 5/5] memcg: mem+swap accounting Daisuke Nishimura
2008-10-20  0:24 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/5] mem+swap resource controller(trial patch) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-20  2:53   ` Daisuke Nishimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48FDBD18.6090100@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox