linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	nathalie.furmento@labri.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: use a radix-tree to make do_move_pages() complexity linear
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:09:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F372BA.7020505@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48F069B8.6050709@inria.fr>

Brice Goglin wrote:
> * One thing that bothers me is move_pages() returning -ENOENT when no
> page are given to migrate_pages(). I don't see why having 100/100 pages
> not migrated would return a different error than having only 99/100
> pages not migrated. We have the status array to place -ENOENT for all
> these pages. If the user doesn't know where his pages are allocated, he
> shouldn't get a different return value depending on how many pages were
> already on the right node. And actually, this convention makes
> user-space application harder to write since you need to treat -ENOENT
> as a success unless you already knew for sure where your pages were
> allocated. And the big thing is that this convention makes the chunking
> painfully/uselessly more complex. Breaking user-ABI is bad, but fixing
> crazy ABI...
>   
I do not think that move_pages() is used that frequently. Changing the 
API slightly as you suggest would not be that big of a deal.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-13 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-09 12:32 Brice Goglin
2008-10-10 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-10 20:11   ` Brice Goglin
2008-10-10 20:32     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-11  8:54       ` Brice Goglin
2008-10-11  8:58         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-11  9:19           ` Brice Goglin
2008-10-13 16:09         ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-10-10 20:59     ` Brice Goglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48F372BA.7020505@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nathalie.furmento@labri.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox