From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
nathalie.furmento@labri.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: use a radix-tree to make do_move_pages() complexity linear
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:32:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EFBBE9.5000703@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48EFB6E6.4080708@inria.fr>
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Just try sys_move_pages() on a 10-100MB buffer, you'll get something
> like 50MB/s on a recent Opteron machine. This throughput decreases
> significantly with the number of pages. With this patch, we get about
> 350MB/s and the throughput is stable when the migrated buffer gets
> larger. I don't have detailled numbers at hand, I'll send them by monday.
Migration throughput is optimal for sys_move_pages() and the cpuset migration.
Some comparison would be useful.
With 100MB you have ~250k pages which will require a vmalloc of 4MB for the
struct pm struct array to control the migration of each individual page.
Would it be possible to restructure this in such a way that we work in chunks
of 100 or so pages each so that we can avoid the vmalloc?
We also could do a kmalloc for each individual struct pm_struct with the radix
tree which would also avoid the vmalloc but still keep the need to allocate
4MB for temporary struct pm_structs.
Or get rid of the pm_struct altogether by storing the address of the node
vector somewhere and retrieve the node as needed from the array. This would
allow storing the struct page * pointers in the radix tree.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-09 12:32 Brice Goglin
2008-10-10 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-10 20:11 ` Brice Goglin
2008-10-10 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-10-11 8:54 ` Brice Goglin
2008-10-11 8:58 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-11 9:19 ` Brice Goglin
2008-10-13 16:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-10 20:59 ` Brice Goglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EFBBE9.5000703@linux-foundation.org \
--to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nathalie.furmento@labri.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox