From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <48D2D4C7.8080209@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:23:03 -0400 From: Chris Snook MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Populating multiple ptes at fault time References: <48D142B2.3040607@goop.org> <48D2A392.6010308@goop.org> <33307c790809181352h14f2cf26kc73de75b939177b5@mail.gmail.com> <48D2BFB8.6010503@redhat.com> <33307c790809181411j41a6fc4ev8560a13ed8661ec2@mail.gmail.com> <48D2C46A.5030702@linux-foundation.org> <33307c790809181421k52ed6a36h9d4ee40d5799a536@mail.gmail.com> <48D2C8DD.4040303@linux-foundation.org> <28c262360809181449v1050c1f7ndf17dadba9fac0bf@mail.gmail.com> <48D2CEF3.6060308@linux-foundation.org> <33307c790809181508v2e64c0a4j8f0e93df99673e63@mail.gmail.com> <48D2D22B.2070408@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <48D2D22B.2070408@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Martin Bligh , MinChan Kim , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickens , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Avi Kivity , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel List-ID: Christoph Lameter wrote: > Martin Bligh wrote: >>> My patches were only for anonymous pages not for file backed because readahead >>> is available for file backed mappings. >> Do we populate the PTEs though? I didn't think that was batched, but I >> might well be wrong. > > We do not populate the PTEs and AFAICT PTE population was assumed not to be > performance critical since the backing media is comparatively slow. > Perhaps we should. In a virtual guest, the backing media is often an emulated IDE device, or something similarly inefficient, such that the bottleneck is the CPU. -- Chris -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org