From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hugh@veritas.com, menage@google.com, xemul@openvz.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:24:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C66AF8.5070505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080909141244.721dfd39.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:00:10 +1000
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>> maybe a routine like SPARSEMEM is a choice.
>>>
>>> Following is pointer pre-allocation. (just pointer, not page_cgroup itself)
>>> ==
>>> #define PCG_SECTION_SHIFT (10)
>>> #define PCG_SECTION_SIZE (1 << PCG_SECTION_SHIFT)
>>>
>>> struct pcg_section {
>>> struct page_cgroup **map[PCG_SECTION_SHIFT]; //array of pointer.
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct page_cgroup *get_page_cgroup(unsigned long pfn)
>>> {
>>> struct pcg_section *sec;
>>> sec = pcg_section[(pfn >> PCG_SECTION_SHIFT)];
>>> return *sec->page_cgroup[(pfn & ((1 << PCG_SECTTION_SHIFT) - 1];
>>> }
>>> ==
>>> If we go extreme, we can use kmap_atomic() for pointer array.
>>>
>>> Overhead of pointer-walk is not so bad, maybe.
>>>
>>> For 64bit systems, we can find a way like SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP.
>> Yes I too think that would be the ideal way to go to get the best of
>> performance in the enabled case. However Balbir I believe is interested
>> in memory savings if not all pages have cgroups... I don't know, I don't
>> care so much about the "enabled" case, so I'll leave you two to fight it
>> out :)
>>
> I'll add a new patch on my set.
>
> Balbir, are you ok to CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR depends on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM ?
> I thinks SPARSEMEM(SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) is widely used in various archs now.
Can't we make it more generic. I was thinking of allocating memory for each node
for page_cgroups (of the size of spanned_pages) at initialization time. I've not
yet prototyped the idea. BTW, even with your approach I fail to see why we need
to add a dependency on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM (but again it is 4:30 in the morning and
I might be missing the obvious)
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-09 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-31 17:47 Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 3:28 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 4:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 5:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 6:16 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 6:09 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 6:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 6:25 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 6:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-01 7:17 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 7:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-02 9:24 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-02 10:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-02 9:58 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-02 10:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-02 10:12 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-02 10:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-02 12:37 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-03 3:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-03 7:31 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-08 15:28 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-09 3:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 3:58 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 4:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 5:00 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 5:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 12:24 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-09-09 12:28 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 12:30 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-09-09 12:34 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 1:20 ` [Approach #2] " Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 1:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 2:11 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 2:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 20:44 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 11:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 21:02 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 11:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 14:34 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 22:21 ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-10 22:31 ` David Miller, Dave Hansen
2008-09-10 22:36 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 22:56 ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-11 1:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-11 1:47 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-11 1:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-17 23:28 ` [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page (v3) Balbir Singh
2008-09-18 1:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-18 3:57 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-18 5:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 4:26 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-09-18 4:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 6:13 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-09-18 4:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 4:58 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-18 5:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 11:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 23:56 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-19 0:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 22:38 ` [Approach #2] [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 4:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-09 4:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 7:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 2:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 3:42 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 9:03 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-09-01 9:17 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 9:43 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-09-01 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-02 7:35 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C66AF8.5070505@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox