From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <48931AD1.6040904@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:16:49 -0500 From: Christoph Lameter MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update Unevictable LRU and Mlocked Pages documentation References: <1217452439.7676.26.camel@lts-notebook> <4891C8BC.1020509@linux-foundation.org> <1217515429.6507.7.camel@lts-notebook> <489313AC.3080605@linux-foundation.org> <20080801100623.4aae3e37@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <20080801100623.4aae3e37@bree.surriel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rik van Riel Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , KOSAKI Motohiro , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Nick Piggin List-ID: Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:46:20 -0500 > Christoph Lameter wrote: > >> Yes I know and I think the rationale is not convincing if the justification >> of the additional LRU is primarily for page migration. > > Basically there are two alternatives: I think we have sufficient reasons to have a second LRU (see my earlier mail) just the text did not emphasize the right ones. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org