From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4891C9D5.8000500@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:19:01 -0500 From: Christoph Lameter MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: MMU notifiers review and some proposals References: <20080724143949.GB12897@wotan.suse.de> <20080725214552.GB21150@duo.random> <20080726030810.GA18896@wotan.suse.de> <20080726113813.GD21150@duo.random> <20080726122826.GA17958@wotan.suse.de> <20080726130202.GA9598@duo.random> <20080726131450.GC21820@wotan.suse.de> <48907880.3020105@linux-foundation.org> <20080730145436.GJ11494@duo.random> <48908BD4.10408@linux-foundation.org> <20080731061419.GB32644@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20080731061419.GB32644@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Linux Memory Management List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, steiner@sgi.com List-ID: Nick Piggin wrote: > That's OK. We don't have to make decisions just by people supporting one > way or the other, because I'll come up with some competing patches and > if they turn out to be significantly simpler to the core VM without having > a significant negative impact on performance then naturally everybody should > be happy to merge them, so nobody has to argue with handwaving. We make decisions based on technical issues. If you can come up with a solution that addresses the issues (please review the earlier discussion on the subject matter) then we will all be happy to see that merged. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org