From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"xemul@openvz.org" <xemul@openvz.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [mmtom] please drop memcg-handle-swap-cache set (memcg handle swap cache rework).
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:44:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4883CDEB.2030403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080717124556.3e4b6e20.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Now, SwapCache is handled by memcg (in -mm) but it became complicated than I thought of.
>
> followings are queued in -mm now.
> memcg-handle-swap-cache.patch
> memcg-handle-swap-cache-fix.patch
> memcg-handle-swap-cache-fix-shmem-page-migration-incorrectness-on-memcgroup.patch
>
> And I have memcg-handle-shmem-swap-cache-fix.patch....
>
> Balbir argued that "This is too complicated!", ok, let's rework.
>
Thanks, it was complicated and simplification is always welcome!
> Andrew, could you drop above 3 patches ? I'd like to retry with clear logic.
>
> I'm testing this new version now. Basic logic is not changed but corner case
> handling is clearer than previous one. If there is something unclear,
> please tell me. I'd like to write easy-to-understand one.
>
> ==
> This patch tries to catch SwapCache usage by memcg in following Rule.
>
> 1. just ignore add_to_swap_cache()
> 2. if a page is uncharged,
> (a) don't uncharge when PageSwapCache(page)
> (b) don't uncharge when the page is mapped.
> (c) don't uncharge when the page is still on radix-tree.
> This can be checked by (page->mapping && !PageAnon(page))
>
> 3. __delete_from_swap_cache() calles uncharge after clearing PageSwapCache flag.
> 4. mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache() is called only after page->mapping is cleared.
> 5. migration has some corner case and handled.
>
My understanding of this patchset now is that
If the page was ever mapped or cached, we don't tweak add_to_swap_cache(),
instead, we keep the page around in the memcg, till it is removed from swap
cache. Is my understanding of your intent correct?
[snip]
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-20 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 3:45 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-18 5:15 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-18 6:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-18 8:26 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-20 23:44 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-07-28 8:22 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4883CDEB.2030403@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox