linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix] mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 10:28:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48727db1-aac8-40d2-be20-9fd7777af62a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68feee73-050e-8e98-7a3a-abf78738d92c@google.com>

> [I guess this is the wrong place to say so, but folio_undo_large_rmappable()
> is a dreadful name: it completely obscures what the function actually does,
> and gives the false impression that the folio would be !large_rmappable
> afterwards. I hope that one day the name gets changed to something like
> folio_unqueue_deferred_split() or folio_cancel_deferred_split().]
Fully agreed, that is absolutely confusing. (and I thought for a second 
that the folio would be !large_rmappable afterwards!)

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-07  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-02  7:40 Hugh Dickins
2024-07-02  9:25 ` Baolin Wang
2024-07-02 16:15   ` Hugh Dickins
2024-07-03  1:51     ` Baolin Wang
2024-07-03  2:13     ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-03 14:30 ` Zi Yan
2024-07-03 16:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-03 16:22     ` Zi Yan
2024-07-04  2:35 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04  3:21   ` Hugh Dickins
2024-07-04  3:28     ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04  6:12     ` Kefeng Wang
2024-07-06 21:29       ` Hugh Dickins
2024-07-07  2:11         ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-07  3:07           ` Kefeng Wang
2024-07-07  8:28         ` David Hildenbrand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48727db1-aac8-40d2-be20-9fd7777af62a@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox