From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.234]) by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m641mnWG029582 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:48:49 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m641nG7J4120830 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:49:16 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m641nfX7030779 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:49:41 +1000 Message-ID: <486D81B9.9030704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:19:45 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.26-rc8-mm1] memrlimit: fix mmap_sem deadlock References: <20080703160117.b3781463.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080703160117.b3781463.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Andrew Morton wrote: > There doesn't seem to have been much discussion regarding your recent > objections to the memrlimit patches. But it caused me to put a big > black mark on them. Perhaps sending it all again would be helpful. Black marks are not good, but there have been some silly issues found with them. I have been addressing/answering concerns raised so far. Would you like me to fold all patches and fixes and send them out for review again? -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org