From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG][PATCH -mm] avoid BUG() in __stop_machine_run()
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:51:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485A806A.2090602@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806192012.44459.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thursday 19 June 2008 16:59:50 Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
>
>> When a process loads a kernel module, __stop_machine_run() is called, and
>> it calls sched_setscheduler() to give newly created kernel threads highest
>> priority. However, the process can have no CAP_SYS_NICE which required
>> for sched_setscheduler() to increase the priority. For example, SystemTap
>> loads its module with only CAP_SYS_MODULE. In this case,
>> sched_setscheduler() returns -EPERM, then BUG() is called.
>>
>
> Hi Hidehiro,
>
> Nice catch. This can happen in the current code, it just doesn't
> BUG().
>
>
>> Failure of sched_setscheduler() wouldn't be a real problem, so this
>> patch just ignores it.
>>
>
> Well, it can mean that the stop_machine blocks indefinitely. Better
> than a BUG(), but we should aim higher.
>
>
>> Or, should we give the CAP_SYS_NICE capability temporarily?
>>
>
> I don't think so. It can be seen from another thread, and in theory
> that should not see something random. Worse, they can change it from
> another thread.
>
> How's this?
>
> sched_setscheduler: add a flag to control access checks
>
> Hidehiro Kawai noticed that sched_setscheduler() can fail in
> stop_machine: it calls sched_setscheduler() from insmod, which can
> have CAP_SYS_MODULE without CAP_SYS_NICE.
>
> This simply introduces a flag to allow us to disable the capability
> checks for internal callers (this is simpler than splitting the
> sched_setscheduler() function, since it loops checking permissions).
>
What about?
int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
struct sched_param *param)
{
return __sched_setscheduler(p, policy, param, true);
}
int sched_setscheduler_nocheck(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
struct sched_param *param)
{
return __sched_setscheduler(p, policy, param, false);
}
(With the appropriate transformation of sched_setscheduler -> __)
Better than scattering stray true/falses around the code.
J
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-19 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-12 5:59 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Andrew Morton
2008-06-12 7:58 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3: kernel BUG at mm/vmscan.c:510 Alexey Dobriyan
2008-06-12 8:22 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-12 8:23 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-06-12 8:44 ` [BUG] 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:575! Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-12 8:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-12 11:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-13 1:44 ` [PATCH] fix double unlock_page() in " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-13 2:13 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-13 15:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-15 3:59 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-16 14:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-17 2:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-17 15:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-13 4:34 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-06-14 13:32 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-12 11:38 ` [BUG] " Nick Piggin
2008-06-13 0:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-13 4:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-06-13 7:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-12 23:32 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Byron Bradley
2008-06-12 23:55 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Daniel Walker
2008-06-13 0:04 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Byron Bradley
2008-06-18 17:55 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Daniel Walker
2008-06-19 9:13 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 14:39 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Daniel Walker
2008-06-17 7:35 ` [PATCH][RFC] fix kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:719! in 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-17 7:47 ` [Bad page] trying to free locked page? (Re: [PATCH][RFC] fix kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:719! in 2.6.26-rc5-mm3) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-17 9:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-17 9:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-17 9:15 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-17 18:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-17 20:00 ` [PATCH] unevictable mlocked pages: initialize mm member of munlock mm_walk structure Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-18 3:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-18 2:40 ` [Bad page] trying to free locked page? (Re: [PATCH][RFC] fix kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:719! in 2.6.26-rc5-mm3) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-17 15:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-18 2:32 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-18 10:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-18 9:40 ` [Experimental][PATCH] putback_lru_page rework KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 11:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-18 11:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-19 8:00 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-19 8:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 14:50 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-18 18:21 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-19 0:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-19 14:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-20 0:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-20 1:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-20 17:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-20 20:41 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-21 8:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-23 0:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-21 8:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-21 8:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-19 15:32 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-06-20 16:24 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-17 15:33 ` [PATCH][RFC] fix kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:719! in 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-18 1:54 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-18 4:41 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-18 4:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 7:54 ` [PATCH][-mm] remove redundant page->mapping check KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-17 17:46 ` [PATCH][RFC] fix kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:719! in 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-17 18:33 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-17 19:28 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-18 5:19 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-18 2:59 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-18 1:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 1:26 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-06-18 1:54 ` [PATCH] migration_entry_wait fix KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 5:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-18 5:35 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-18 6:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-18 6:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 7:29 ` [PATCH -mm][BUGFIX] migration_entry_wait fix. v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-18 7:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-18 7:40 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-19 6:59 ` [BUG][PATCH -mm] avoid BUG() in __stop_machine_run() Hidehiro Kawai
2008-06-19 10:12 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-19 15:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-06-20 13:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-23 3:55 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-23 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 16:27 ` 2.6.26-rc5-mm3: BUG large value for HugePages_Rsvd Jon Tollefson
2008-06-19 17:16 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-20 3:18 ` Jon Tollefson
2008-06-20 19:17 ` [RFC] hugetlb reservations -- MAP_PRIVATE fixes for split vmas Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-20 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb reservations: move region tracking earlier Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-20 19:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] hugetlb reservations: fix hugetlb MAP_PRIVATE reservations across vma splits Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-23 7:33 ` Mel Gorman
2008-06-23 8:00 ` Mel Gorman
2008-06-23 9:53 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-23 16:04 ` [RFC] hugetlb reservations -- MAP_PRIVATE fixes for split vmas Jon Tollefson
2008-06-23 17:35 ` [RFC] hugetlb reservations -- MAP_PRIVATE fixes for split vmas V2 Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-23 17:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb reservations: move region tracking earlier Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-23 23:05 ` Mel Gorman
2008-06-23 17:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] hugetlb reservations: fix hugetlb MAP_PRIVATE reservations across vma splits V2 Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-23 23:08 ` Mel Gorman
2008-06-25 21:22 ` [RFC] hugetlb reservations -- MAP_PRIVATE fixes for split vmas V2 Jon Tollefson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485A806A.2090602@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
--cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox