From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <48501D7C.5050600@goop.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:46:20 +0100 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] mm: vmap rewrite References: <20080605102015.GA11366@wotan.suse.de> <484AC779.1070803@goop.org> <20080610025312.GC19404@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20080610025312.GC19404@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-ID: Nick Piggin wrote: > It's harder than that even, because we don't own the page flags, so then > clearing the PG_kalias bit would require that we make all page flags ops > atomic in all parts of the kernel. Obviously not going to happen. > > The other thing we could do is have vmap layer keep some p->v translations > around (actually it doesn't even need to go all the way to v, just a single > bit would suffice) So I guess this would be like another page flag, but > without the atomicity problem and without me getting angry at using another > flag ;) Still, I'd rather not do this and slow everything else down. > Yeah. It's a bit awkward to maintain a secondary structure just to deal with the confluence of two edge cases (running Xen + reusing an aliased page in a pagetable). > It could be switched on at runtime if Xen is running perhaps. Or the other > thing Xen could do is keep a cache of unaliased page table pages. You > could fill it up N pages at a time, and just do a single unmap_aliases call > to sanitize them all; also, clean pages returned from pagetables could be > reused. Like the quicklists things. > Hm, that wouldn't be too bad (so long as it doesn't end up hiding gigabytes of memory away from the rest of the system ;). > Or: doesn't the host have to do its own alias check anyway? In case of an > AWOL guest? Why not just reuse that and trap back into the guest to fix it > up? That's possible, but awkward. In many cases these updates will be batched, so it would become a matter of issuing a batch, then picking through the results to see what worked and what failed. I suppose I could just do the simple flush and then if that turns out too expensive, do the submit-and-retry approach. J -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org