From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <483C140B.8050605@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 23:00:43 +0900 From: Daisuke Nishimura MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) References: <483647AB.8090104@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20080527073118.0D92B5A0E@siro.lan> <483BBB4C.3040501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <483BC690.6010206@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <483C0A0D.50909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <483C0FB2.7080706@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <483C10C0.7040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <483C10C0.7040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi , containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, xemul@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, hugh@veritas.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com List-ID: On 2008/05/27 22:46 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: > Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >> On 2008/05/27 22:18 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >>> Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >>>> On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >>>>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>>>>> hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>>>>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>>>>>> before going further. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Daisuke Nishimura. >>>>>> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >>>>>> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >>>>>> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >>>>>> >>>>>> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >>>>>> >>>> Of cource. >>>> I'll work hard to make it better. >>>> >>>>> I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. >>>>> Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both >>>>> are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. >>>>> infrastructure used. >>>>> >>>> Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's >>>> and mine? >>>> >>>> Basically, I think it's difficult to merge >>>> because we charge different objects. >>>> >>> Yes, I know - that's why I said infrastructure, to see the grouping and common >>> data structure aspects. I'll try and review the code. >>> >> OK. >> >> I'll wait for your patch. > > Hi, Daisuke-San > > I am not sending out any patch (sorry for the confusion, if I caused it). I am > going to review the swapcgroup patchset. > No problem :-) I would very appreciate it if you review swap cgroup patches. I'll update my patches based on your and others' comments. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org