From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <483BC690.6010206@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 17:30:08 +0900 From: Daisuke Nishimura MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) References: <483647AB.8090104@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20080527073118.0D92B5A0E@siro.lan> <483BBB4C.3040501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <483BBB4C.3040501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, YAMAMOTO Takashi Cc: containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, xemul@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, hugh@veritas.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com List-ID: On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: > YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> hi, >> >>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>> >>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>> before going further. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Daisuke Nishimura. >> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >> >> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >> Of cource. I'll work hard to make it better. > > I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. > Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both > are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. > infrastructure used. > Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's and mine? Basically, I think it's difficult to merge because we charge different objects. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org