From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <483647AB.8090104@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 13:27:23 +0900 From: Daisuke Nishimura MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) References: <48350F15.9070007@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <4835E55A.1000308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4835E55A.1000308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Linux Containers , Linux MM , Pavel Emelyanov , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , YAMAMOTO Takashi , Hugh Dickins , "IKEDA, Munehiro" List-ID: Hi. On 2008/05/23 6:27 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: > Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I updated my swapcgroup patch. >> >> Major changes from previous version(*1): >> - Rebased on 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 + KAMEZAWA-san's performance >> improvement patchset v4. >> - Implemented as a add-on to memory cgroup. >> So, there is no need to add a new member to page_cgroup now. >> - (NEW)Modified vm_swap_full() to calculate the rate of >> swap usage per cgroup. >> >> Patchs: >> - [1/4] add cgroup files >> - [2/4] add member to swap_info_struct for cgroup >> - [3/4] implement charge/uncharge >> - [4/4] modify vm_swap_full for cgroup >> >> ToDo: >> - handle force_empty. >> - make it possible for users to select if they use >> this feature or not, and avoid overhead for users >> not using this feature. >> - move charges along with task move between cgroups. >> > > Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap > controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? > Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other before going further. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org