From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"xemul@openvz.org" <xemul@openvz.org>,
"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/6] memcg: remove refcnt
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:42:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482B950C.2060408@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080514170703.db2d9802.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> /*
> - * Uncharging is always a welcome operation, we never complain, simply
> - * uncharge.
> + * uncharge if !page_mapped(page)
> */
> -void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum charge_type ctype)
static void ?
> {
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> @@ -704,29 +693,41 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct pag
> goto unlock;
>
[..snip..]
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page
> extern int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask);
> extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page);
> +extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page);
> +extern int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask);
This function is defined and used in the 4th patch, so the declaration
should be moved to that patch.
> extern void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page, bool active);
> extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct list_head *dst,
> @@ -53,7 +55,6 @@ extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_fro
> extern int
> mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
> extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page);
> -extern int mem_cgroup_getref(struct page *page);
>
> /*
> * For memory reclaim.
> @@ -97,6 +98,14 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_cache_charg
> static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> {
> }
need a blank line here
> +static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> +}
> +
[..snip..]
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/mm/shmem.c
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -961,13 +961,14 @@ found:
> shmem_swp_unmap(ptr);
> spin_unlock(&info->lock);
> radix_tree_preload_end();
> -uncharge:
> - mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
> out:
> unlock_page(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
> iput(inode); /* allows for NULL */
> return error;
> +uncharge:
> + mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
> + goto out;
> }
>
Seems the logic is changed here. is it intended ?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-15 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-14 8:02 [RFC/PATCH 0/6] memcg: peformance improvement at el. v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:04 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/6] memcg: drop_pages at force_empty KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:07 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/6] memcg: remove refcnt KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15 1:42 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2008-05-15 1:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15 3:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/6] memcg: handle swapcache KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/6] memcg: shmem reclaim helper KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:15 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14 8:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:23 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14 8:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/6] memcg: optimize branch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:13 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/6] memcg: remove redundant check at charge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482B950C.2060408@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox